Failure to follow up on CT scan
A 69-year-old man came to the ED with worsening shortness of breath. His history included smoking, COPD, and an occluded right coronary artery.
by Laura Hale Brockway, ELS, Assistant Vice President, Marketing, and
Susie Edwards, Risk Management Representative
Presentation
On May 1, 2013, a 69-year-old man came to the emergency department (ED) with worsening shortness of breath.
The patient’s history included smoking, COPD, and an occluded right coronary artery, of which he had a right ventricular infarction. He also had a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, angioplasty, and stenting multiple times. The patient was taking baby aspirin.
Physician action
Upon admission to the hospital, the patient was seen by a cardiologist. He ordered chest x-rays and noted that there was no evidence of STEMI on the EKG. A CT scan of the patient’s chest taken on May 1 revealed some noncalcified pulmonary nodules.
In documentation for both x-rays, the radiologist recommended either a follow-up PET/CT or a repeat of the CT scan in four to six months to determine the potential for malignancy.
The patient was discharged on May 4, with recommendations to either get a PET or CT scan versus a four-to six-month short-term CT scan. The cardiologist noted that he would try to see whether they could do a PET scan as well.
The cardiologist next saw the patient in his office on August 1. The patient reported shortness of breath and abdominal pain. At this visit, there was no mention of the previous abnormal CT scan. The cardiologist told the patient to return in three months.
The patient was next seen by the cardiologist on November 15, 2013, and February 23, 2014. During these office visits, there was no follow up about the abnormalities from the May 1 CT scan and no follow-up on the recommendations from the radiologist about further testing.
On May 23, 2014, the patient returned to the cardiologist reporting chest pain. A repeat CT scan was done and compared to the CT scan from May 1, 2013. The radiologist reported “multiple, bilateral lung masses; left mass measuring 2.8 x 3.1 cm; malignant process suspected.” A CT-guided biopsy of the lung mass confirmed “small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, high grade, poorly differentiated.”
The patient went on to receive chemotherapy.
Allegations
A lawsuit was filed against the cardiologist, alleging failure to follow up on the May 1, 2013 CT scan. The suit also alleged that had a follow-up scan been pursued, the patient likely would have been cured.
Legal implications
Cardiologists who reviewed this case for the defense found that the cardiologist’s failure to follow up with the radiologist’s recommendations for further testing was below the standard of care.
Oncologists who reviewed this case found that at the time of the patient’s scan on May 1, 2013, the patient already had advanced cancer and was believed to be incurable. Even if there had been no delay in treatment, his outcome likely would have been the same.
Disposition
A complication for the defense was to have to concede liability on the part of the cardiologist and try to convince a jury that the delay did not change the patient’s treatment or outcome. Because of this difficulty, this case was settled on behalf of the cardiologist.
More on failure to follow up.
Disclaimer
This closed claim study is based on an actual malpractice claim from Texas Medical Liability Trust. This case illustrates how action or inaction on the part of the physicians led to allegations of professional liability, and how risk management techniques may have either prevented the outcome or increased the physician’s defensibility. This study has been modified to protect the privacy of the physicians and the patient.
Subscribe to Case Closed to receive insights from resolved cases.
You’ll receive two closed claim studies every month. These closed claim studies are provided to help physicians improve patient safety and reduce potential liability risks that may arise when treating patients.
Related Case Studies
Discover more insights, stories, and resources to keep you informed and inspired.
Failure to review radiology report
Failure to follow up on wound culture
