Failure to diagnose epidural abscess
A 44-year-old woman with a history of IV drug use was treated at a clinic for a foot infection and back spasms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/804d2/804d269ed014b366d3611e103dbf4a801e4d58f2" alt=""
Presentation and physician action
A 44-year-old woman with a history of IV drug use was treated at a clinic for a foot infection and back spasms.
A month later, she returned to the clinic and was sent to Hospital A for treatment of a MRSA infection. She was admitted by Emergency Physician A, treated with antibiotics, and discharged from the hospital approximately two weeks later.
The patient returned to the hospital’s ED several weeks later due to continued back pain. She was diagnosed with back strain or sprain and released from the ED. She returned the next day with complaints of abdominal pain. Emergency Physician B ordered a CT scan of the abdomen.
At 6:55 a.m., while being prepped for the CT scan, the patient complained that she could not move her legs.
At 7 a.m., a shift change occurred and Emergency Physician C began caring for the patient. Emergency Physician C was told the patient could not move her legs, but did not re-evaluate the patient. At 9:30 a.m., a nurse noted that the patient was standing on both feet and bearing weight.
At 10 a.m., a radiologist reviewed the CT scan and diagnosed “hepatosplenomegaly.” He also reviewed an x-ray of the spine and did not find anything abnormal. At 10:30 a.m., the patient was discharged. It was noted that the patient was combative and did not want to be discharged due to her reports that she could not move her legs.
Later that day, the patient’s parents brought her back to the ED. Emergency Physician C admitted the patient at approximately 1 p.m. and ordered an MRI of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine for paralysis/paraplegia.
After two days in the hospital without the MRI series being performed, Emergency Physician A reordered the MRI of the thoracic and lumbar spine. During this time, the patient reported no improvement in feeling or function.
The next day, the MRI of the lumbar spine was completed. The thoracic MRI was not completed because the patient could not tolerate it. Interpretations of the MRI on the lumbar spine suggested “clumping of the nerve roots at L4 to L5 levels consistent with arachnoiditis.”
After several days, the patient was transferred to Hospital B, a higher-level facility, and evaluated by a neurosurgeon. By this time, the patient had lost function in her legs, developed bladder and bowel incontinence, and lost sphincter control.
The same day as the patient’s transfer, the neurosurgeon discovered a spinal abscess and immediately took the patient to surgery to treat it. The patient remains a paraplegic requiring lifelong care.
Allegations
Lawsuits were filed against Hospital A, the ED physicians, and the radiologist. Allegations include failure to timely diagnose the epidural abscess.
The plaintiffs also alleged that the radiologist should have noted abnormal findings on the abdominal CT scan, which would have alerted the ED physicians to order a STAT spinal MRI. The delay in completing the MRI led to the patient’s deterioration and delay in transfer and treatment at Hospital B. It was alleged that if treatment had been timelier, paralysis would have been prevented.
Legal implications
Experts for the plaintiff criticized Hospital A for discharging the patient against her will, especially considering her complaints of sudden paralysis. They were also critical of the physicians for not following up on the MRI after several days, or prompting a STAT order given the patient’s condition. One expert felt that the patient’s paralysis warranted a STAT MRI. A resulting diagnosis of spinal abscess would have indicated a medical emergency.
Experts also noted abnormalities on the CT scan that the radiologist did not document, such as inflammation around the spine and a possible soft tissue mass near the thoracic spine. Even though he reviewed the CT scan for abdominal pain, he should have been aware of the back pain since he also reviewed an x-ray of the patient’s spine.
Helpful to the defense was the opinion from the treating neurosurgeon. He believed the patient suffered from an acute infarct, which resulted in her abrupt paralysis prior to the CT scan. Even if the radiologist had noted abnormalities or the MRI completed earlier, once an occlusion occurs it takes only 30 minutes to cause permanent neurological damage.
Expert opinions from all sides agreed that it was likely the patient’s IV drug use led to the MRSA infection, which may have caused her spinal abscess. The patient’s reluctance to discuss her IV drug use may have also contributed to delays in her care.
The case was further complicated by allegations that several hospital staff members were dismissive of the patient, due to her lack of insurance and history of drug abuse.
Disposition
The case was settled early on behalf of the radiologists and hospital. The cases against the ED physicians were settled during jury selection.
More on diagnostic errors.
Risk management for radiologists.
Disclaimer
This closed claim study is based on an actual malpractice claim from Texas Medical Liability Trust. This case illustrates how action or inaction on the part of the physicians led to allegations of professional liability, and how risk management techniques may have either prevented the outcome or increased the physician’s defensibility. This study has been modified to protect the privacy of the physicians and the patient.
Subscribe to Case Closed to receive insights from resolved cases.
You’ll receive two closed claim studies every month. These closed claim studies are provided to help physicians improve patient safety and reduce potential liability risks that may arise when treating patients.
Related Case Studies
Discover more insights, stories, and resources to keep you informed and inspired.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34776/347767dc5511a13eb7c7512e1065993f30372e4d" alt=""
Failure to diagnose postoperative infection
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e67/06e677a38f06747f68d0e58205181f63c5ede529" alt=""
Failure to diagnose necrotizing fasciitis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd345/bd34503f76bfd285cd8eeb5070faed36500aeaa5" alt=""