Prescribing medication to a patient with a known allergy
A 60-year-old man called his family physician to report great pain from a twisted ankle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/804d2/804d269ed014b366d3611e103dbf4a801e4d58f2" alt=""
Presentation
In June 2014, a 60-year-old man called his primary care physician to report that he had twisted his ankle and was in great pain. He told the physician that he had taken acetaminophen, but it did not help. He requested a prescription for pain medication.
The patient had a history of lupus, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic anemia, and kidney disease. He also had allergies to naproxen, codeine, penicillin, and diphenhydramine. His medications included prednisone.
Physician action
The physician was transitioning to a part-time practice and retirement and was without an office or access to the patient’s chart. He did not see the patient. The physician called in prescriptions for naproxen and tramadol. The physician did not document any discussion of medication allergies.
The patient called the pharmacy to confirm receipt of the new prescriptions. Typically, the patient referred to naproxen, a medication he was allergic to, by its over-the-counter brand name. He expressed concern to the pharmacist about his medication allergies, and asked if the new prescriptions were safe. The pharmacist said it was okay to take these medications, but if he had any reactions to stop taking them.
Two days later, the patient was transported by ambulance to the emergency department (ED) of a local hospital for an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. The patient reported severe pain and skin eruptions on his right arm, chest, and pelvis.
He told the ED physician that he had taken the naproxen and tramadol, but thought the tramadol caused the rash. He stopped taking it, but continued the naproxen which worsened his condition. He had attempted to treat the blisters at home with silver sulfadiazine. The ED physician noted her clinical impression as generalized drug rash due to oral naproxen.
The patient was admitted to the hospital and ultimately diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS). He was in the ICU for three days and then transferred to a different hospital for treatment in a burn unit.
The patient was in the hospital for 12 days, and noted to be in pain and confused. The patient experienced significant skin blistering over 20 percent of his body and sloughing on his chest and flanks. He recovered but was left with scarring.
Allegations
A lawsuit was filed against the primary care physician and the pharmacy. Allegations included improperly prescribing naproxen when the patient had a known allergy to the drug. It was further alleged that the prescription caused the patient to develop SJS; to be hospitalized for almost two weeks; and to develop permanent scarring.
Legal implications
This case was reviewed by several consultants for the defense, who were critical of the primary care physician for poor documentation. One consultant described the physician’s record keeping as “grossly substandard,” often lacking dates and important details.
This consultant also criticized the physician for prescribing naproxen to a patient with renal insufficiency, as these patients are at higher risk for worsening kidney disease when taking an NSAID. He also argued that some patients do not recognize a generic drug name as the same as an over-the-counter brand name. Greater care should be taken to educate patients about a drug’s generic name versus its brand names.
A consultant for the plaintiff stated that the physician breached the standard of care by neglecting to check the patient’s drug allergies. He further stated that had the physician maintained better office documentation and paid more attention to the patient’s history, the patient’s drug reaction and SJS could have been prevented.
All consultants were critical of the pharmacist for not being more alert to the patient’s drug allergies, and for telling him naproxen was safe to take. The pharmacist’s actions were considered a significant contributor to the complications experienced by the patient.
Disposition
This case was settled on behalf of the primary care physician. The pharmacy also settled with the patient.
More on medication errors.
Risk management for adult primary care.
Disclaimer
This closed claim study is based on an actual malpractice claim from Texas Medical Liability Trust. This case illustrates how action or inaction on the part of the physicians led to allegations of professional liability, and how risk management techniques may have either prevented the outcome or increased the physician’s defensibility. This study has been modified to protect the privacy of the physicians and the patient.
Subscribe to Case Closed to receive insights from resolved cases.
You’ll receive two closed claim studies every month. These closed claim studies are provided to help physicians improve patient safety and reduce potential liability risks that may arise when treating patients.
Related Case Studies
Discover more insights, stories, and resources to keep you informed and inspired.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e67/06e677a38f06747f68d0e58205181f63c5ede529" alt=""
Patient injury during colposcopy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7cd6/c7cd68868f8777b31f0885f58a785ae00386c4d7" alt=""
Failure to prescribe correct medication
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74b7f/74b7f4c082929be07492e79d2970a983b7924f29" alt=""